Nevada vs South Dakota

Side-by-side comparison of dynasty trust laws

98.0
South Dakota
View details →

Which is right for you?

Your specific goals and circumstances determine the best choice. Take our personalized comparison.

Get Personalized Results →
CriteriaNevadaSouth Dakota
Dynasty Duration
How long can a trust last in this jurisdiction? States that have abolished the Rule Against Perpetui...
100
Perpetual (personal property)
100
Perpetual
State Income Tax
Does the state impose income tax on trust income? States with no income tax or favorable trust taxat...
100
No state income tax
100
No state income tax
Asset Protection
How strong are the state's Domestic Asset Protection Trust (DAPT) laws? Key factors include statute ...
95
Strong DAPT with 2-year statute of limitations
95
Strong DAPT with 2-year statute of limitations
Directed Trust & Trust Protector
Does the state have robust statutes for directed trusts (separating investment and distribution duti...
98
Comprehensive directed trust and trust protector statutes
100
Comprehensive directed trust and trust protector statutes
Higher
Decanting Flexibility
How easily can trust terms be modified through decanting? Broader decanting powers allow for greater...
92
Broad decanting powers with notice requirement
95
Broad decanting powers
Higher

Detailed Comparison

Dynasty Duration

Nevada

100
Perpetual (personal property)

Nevada abolished the Rule Against Perpetuities for personal property in 2005. Trusts holding financial assets, securities, and business interests can continue indefinitely. Real property interests remain subject to the common law RAP.

  • ⚠️ Real estate is still subject to Rule Against Perpetuities unless converted to personal property

South Dakota

100
Perpetual

South Dakota abolished the Rule Against Perpetuities in 1983, allowing trusts to last indefinitely. South Dakota was one of the first states to abolish the RAP and remains a leader in dynasty trust planning.

State Income Tax

Nevada

100
No state income tax

Nevada's constitution prohibits state income tax. This applies to individuals, corporations, and trusts. Trust income is not taxed at the state level regardless of trustee location, beneficiary location, or income source.

South Dakota

100
No state income tax

South Dakota's constitution prohibits a state income tax. This applies to all income including trust income, making it one of the most favorable states for accumulating wealth within a trust.

Asset Protection

Nevada

95
Strong DAPT with 2-year statute of limitations

Nevada has one of the strongest DAPT statutes with a 2-year statute of limitations for fraudulent transfer claims. The state allows self-settled spendthrift trusts and has fewer exception creditors than many competing jurisdictions.

  • ⚠️ Alimony and child support obligations are exception creditors
  • ⚠️ Certain tort claims arising before transfer may reach assets
  • ⚠️ Property settlement claims from divorce can pierce protection

South Dakota

95
Strong DAPT with 2-year statute of limitations

South Dakota enacted its Domestic Asset Protection Trust legislation in 1997. The statute features a 2-year statute of limitations for fraudulent transfer claims, one of the shortest in the nation. Self-settled spendthrift trusts are permitted.

  • ⚠️ Child support and alimony obligations are exception creditors
  • ⚠️ Existing creditors at time of transfer may still have claims if transfer was fraudulent

Directed Trust & Trust Protector

Nevada

98
Comprehensive directed trust and trust protector statutes

Nevada has comprehensive directed trust statutes allowing separation of trustee duties. Investment advisors and distribution advisors can direct the trustee with explicit liability protection. Trust protector powers are broadly defined and can include powers to modify trust terms, remove trustees, and change situs.

South Dakota

100
Comprehensive directed trust and trust protector statutes

South Dakota is widely recognized as having the most comprehensive directed trust statutes in the nation. The state allows complete separation of investment and distribution responsibilities with explicit liability protection for directed trustees. Trust protector statutes are equally robust.

Decanting Flexibility

Nevada

92
Broad decanting powers with notice requirement

Nevada's decanting statute allows trustees with discretionary authority to distribute trust property to new trusts with modified terms. No court approval is required. Decanting can add trust protector provisions, change administrative provisions, and modify beneficial interests in many cases.

  • ⚠️ Cannot reduce fixed income interests
  • ⚠️ Cannot eliminate vested interests
  • ⚠️ Cannot decant to reduce charitable interests

South Dakota

95
Broad decanting powers

South Dakota permits broad decanting with minimal court involvement. Trustees with discretionary distribution authority can decant to new trusts with modified terms, including changes to beneficial interests, administrative provisions, and trust protector powers.

The Bottom Line: NV vs SD

Both are top-tier. Nevada edges SD on asset protection; SD has better trust company infrastructure. For most people, you can't go wrong with either.

Choose Nevada If...

Asset protection is your absolute #1 priority, or your attorney has Nevada expertise.

Choose South Dakota If...

You want the most established trust industry and broadest trustee selection.

Real Talk

This is like asking iPhone or Android. Both work great. Pick the one your attorney knows better. If all else is equal, SD's trust industry is slightly more developed.

More Comparisons

Disclaimer: This comparison provides general information for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Laws change frequently; verify all information with current statutes and consult qualified professionals before making any decisions.